When a defective product causes a fatal injury in Chandler, Arizona, the surviving family members may pursue a wrongful death claim against the manufacturer, distributor, or seller. A Chandler defective product wrongful death lawyer helps families seek compensation for medical expenses, funeral costs, lost income, and the profound emotional suffering caused by losing a loved one to a preventable tragedy.
Defective product wrongful death cases represent a unique intersection of two complex areas of law: product liability and wrongful death. Unlike typical accident cases where negligence must be proven, product liability claims can proceed under strict liability principles, meaning families don’t always need to prove the manufacturer was careless—only that the product was dangerously defective. This legal framework exists because manufacturers have superior knowledge, resources, and control over product design and safety, while consumers reasonably expect the products they purchase won’t kill them. When a design flaw, manufacturing error, or failure to warn about known dangers results in death, Arizona law provides a path for accountability that recognizes both the family’s loss and society’s interest in preventing future tragedies through legal consequences.
If your family lost someone due to a defective product in Chandler, Life Justice Law Group provides compassionate representation with a deep understanding of both product liability and wrongful death law. We offer free consultations and work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing unless we win your case. Call (480) 378-8088 today to discuss your legal options and learn how we can help your family pursue justice and financial security after this devastating loss.
Understanding Defective Product Wrongful Death Claims in Chandler
A defective product wrongful death claim arises when a consumer dies as a direct result of using a product that was unreasonably dangerous due to a design defect, manufacturing defect, or inadequate warnings. Under Arizona law, these claims combine elements of product liability (which focuses on the dangerous condition of the product) with wrongful death statutes (which address who can recover and what damages are available). The legal theory recognizes that manufacturers place products into the stream of commerce and profit from their sale, so they should bear responsibility when those products cause fatal harm.
The foundation of these claims rests on the principle that products should be safe for their intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse. When a product fails this standard and kills someone, the law allows the deceased person’s estate and surviving family members to seek compensation. In Chandler, as throughout Arizona, these cases can involve any consumer product—from vehicles and machinery to medical devices, household appliances, children’s products, and pharmaceuticals. The key question is whether the product’s condition made it unreasonably dangerous, not whether the company intended harm or acted carelessly.
Types of Product Defects That Can Lead to Wrongful Death
Product defects fall into three distinct legal categories, each with different proof requirements and liability theories. Understanding which category applies to your case determines the evidence needed and the parties who can be held responsible.
Design Defects – The product’s blueprint or specifications were inherently dangerous even before manufacturing began. Every unit produced shares the same flaw because the danger exists in the original design. Examples include vehicles that roll over too easily due to a high center of gravity, medical devices with components that predictably fail inside the body, or power tools lacking necessary safety guards. Design defect cases often require expert testimony comparing the product’s design to safer alternative designs that were economically and technologically feasible when the product was created.
Manufacturing Defects – The design was safe, but something went wrong during production, assembly, or quality control. These defects affect only certain units rather than the entire product line. A pharmaceutical batch contaminated during production, a vehicle with improperly installed brakes, or a crib with a defective weld all represent manufacturing defects. These cases often prove easier than design defect cases because the manufacturer’s own specifications demonstrate what the product should have been, and the defective unit clearly deviates from that standard.
Marketing Defects (Failure to Warn) – The product itself may be properly designed and manufactured, but the company failed to provide adequate instructions or warnings about known dangers. This includes missing warnings about side effects of medications, insufficient instructions for safe operation of machinery, or failure to disclose risks discovered after the product reached the market. Arizona law requires warnings about dangers that aren’t obvious to ordinary consumers and about risks the manufacturer knew or should have known existed through reasonable testing and research.
Who Can Be Held Liable in Chandler Defective Product Wrongful Death Cases
Arizona’s product liability framework allows claims against multiple parties in the chain of distribution, recognizing that various entities share responsibility for ensuring product safety before items reach consumers.
Manufacturers – The company that designed and produced the product bears primary responsibility for defects. This includes both the brand-name company consumers recognize and contract manufacturers who produce goods for other companies. Manufacturers have the greatest control over product safety and the most resources to conduct testing, implement quality control, and warn about discovered dangers. They remain liable even if they sold the product to a distributor rather than directly to consumers.
Distributors and Wholesalers – Companies in the middle of the supply chain can be held liable under Arizona law even if they never touched or inspected the product. This strict liability exists because distributors profit from placing products in commerce and are better positioned than injured consumers to spread the cost of injuries through insurance and pricing. Distributors may also have independent liability if they knew about defects and failed to warn retailers or consumers.
Retailers – Stores that sell defective products to consumers can face liability regardless of whether they knew about the defect or had any ability to discover it. A Chandler retailer that sold a defective space heater that caused a fatal fire can be named as a defendant even though the store didn’t manufacture the heater and had no reason to know about the defect. This encourages retailers to carefully select manufacturers and maintains pressure on the entire distribution system to prioritize safety.
Component Part Manufacturers – When a defective component causes a product to fail with fatal results, the company that manufactured that specific part can be held responsible. If defective brake pads made by a parts supplier cause a fatal vehicle crash, the parts manufacturer may be liable even though they didn’t make the complete vehicle. These cases require clear proof that the specific component was defective and caused the death rather than problems with other parts of the final product.
Arizona’s Wrongful Death Statute and Who Can File Claims
Arizona law strictly defines who has legal standing to bring a wrongful death claim, with a specific order of priority that determines who controls the case and who benefits from any recovery.
Under A.R.S. § 12-612, only certain individuals can file a wrongful death lawsuit. The surviving spouse has the first and exclusive right to bring the claim. If there is no surviving spouse or if the spouse chooses not to file within a reasonable time, the right passes to the deceased person’s children. If there are no surviving spouse or children, the right to file goes to the deceased person’s parents. If none of these relatives exist, the deceased person’s personal representative may bring the claim on behalf of the estate. This hierarchy prevents multiple conflicting lawsuits and ensures family members closest to the deceased control decisions about pursuing legal action.
The statute of limitations for wrongful death claims in Arizona is two years from the date of death under A.R.S. § 12-542. This deadline is strict and inflexible except in rare circumstances. If the two-year period expires before a lawsuit is filed, the court will dismiss the case regardless of how strong the evidence is or how severe the family’s losses. However, product liability claims may involve the discovery rule in cases where the defect wasn’t immediately apparent, potentially extending the deadline. Families should consult an attorney as early as possible to preserve all legal rights and ensure evidence is gathered while still available.
Common Products Involved in Fatal Defect Cases in Chandler
Certain product categories appear repeatedly in wrongful death cases due to their widespread use, complexity, or the severe consequences when they fail.
Motor Vehicles – Defective cars, trucks, and SUVs cause fatal accidents when critical safety systems fail. Defects in airbags, seatbelts, braking systems, steering mechanisms, fuel systems, and tire designs have led to thousands of deaths nationwide. Rollovers caused by design defects in SUVs, fires resulting from defective fuel tanks, and catastrophic injuries from exploding airbag inflators represent some of the most devastating vehicle defect cases.
Medical Devices and Pharmaceuticals – Implanted medical devices like pacemakers, artificial hips, surgical mesh, and IVC filters can cause death when they break, migrate, or contain toxic materials. Prescription drugs may have undisclosed side effects including heart attacks, strokes, internal bleeding, or organ failure. These cases often involve extensive corporate knowledge of dangers that was concealed from doctors and patients.
Machinery and Power Equipment – Industrial equipment, construction tools, and agricultural machinery can kill workers when safety guards are inadequate, emergency stops fail, or designs create pinch points and crushing hazards. Lawn equipment, power saws, and other consumer tools may lack necessary safety features that would prevent fatal injuries during foreseeable use or misuse.
Children’s Products – Cribs, car seats, strollers, toys, and other products designed for children have caused wrongful deaths when they include small parts that cause choking, tip-over hazards, strangulation risks from cords or slats, or toxic materials. These cases are particularly tragic because products marketed as safe for children violated the trust parents placed in manufacturers and regulators.
Home Appliances and Electronics – Space heaters, electrical devices, lithium batteries, and gas appliances can cause fatal fires or explosions when defectively designed or manufactured. Carbon monoxide poisoning from defective furnaces or generators, electrocution from improperly insulated electronics, and burns from overheating devices represent common fatal defects in household products.
Compensation Available in Chandler Defective Product Wrongful Death Cases
Arizona law allows recovery of both economic and non-economic damages in wrongful death cases, though the specific damages depend on who is bringing the claim and the circumstances of the death.
Economic damages compensate for measurable financial losses. Medical expenses incurred before death, including emergency treatment, hospitalization, surgery, and other care, can be recovered even if insurance paid the bills. Funeral and burial costs are recoverable along with the reasonable value of the funeral service. Lost income and benefits represent the wages and employment benefits the deceased would have earned over their expected working life, calculated using evidence of the person’s earnings history, career trajectory, education, and work-life expectancy. The loss of household services provided by the deceased, including childcare, home maintenance, and other contributions, also carries economic value that can be quantified and recovered.
Non-economic damages address intangible losses that deeply affect surviving family members but resist precise monetary calculation. Loss of companionship, comfort, and society compensates for the absence of the deceased person’s presence, guidance, and emotional support in the lives of family members. Loss of consortium recognizes the intimate relationship between spouses that death has destroyed. Pain and suffering before death can be recovered in some cases as part of the wrongful death claim. The loss of protection, guidance, and training that children suffer when a parent dies represents a compensable harm, as does the grief and emotional trauma family members endure.
Arizona does not allow punitive damages in wrongful death cases under A.R.S. § 12-613, but families may be able to recover punitive damages through a separate survival action. A survival action allows the deceased person’s estate to pursue claims the deceased could have brought if they had survived, including claims for pain and suffering before death and potentially punitive damages if the defendant’s conduct was particularly reckless or intentional.
The Product Liability Investigation and Evidence Gathering Process
Building a successful defective product wrongful death case requires extensive investigation beyond what typical accident cases need, because proving a product defect often involves technical evidence, corporate documents, and expert analysis.
Preserve the Product and All Related Evidence
The defective product itself is the most critical piece of evidence in these cases. Families should preserve the actual product that caused the death, including all component parts, even damaged ones. Do not allow the manufacturer to take possession of the product unless your attorney is present and can document its condition. Photographs and videos of the product, the accident scene, and any warning labels or instructions should be taken immediately.
Preserve any documents related to the product including purchase receipts, user manuals, warranty information, and maintenance records. If the death occurred at a workplace, accident reports, OSHA filings, and workplace incident documentation become critical evidence. Medical records detailing the injuries and cause of death establish the link between the product defect and the fatal outcome.
Retain Expert Witnesses in Relevant Fields
Product defect cases require testimony from experts who can explain complex technical issues to a jury. Engineering experts analyze the product’s design and manufacturing to identify defects and explain how safer alternatives were available. Accident reconstruction specialists determine exactly how the product failed and caused the fatal injuries. Medical experts establish the cause of death and connect it to the product defect rather than other possible causes.
These experts review the physical evidence, test similar products, examine corporate documents about the product’s development, and prepare reports explaining their findings. Their testimony often determines whether a case succeeds or fails, because juries need expert guidance to understand whether a product met industry safety standards or violated them.
Obtain Corporate Documents Through Discovery
The legal discovery process allows attorneys to obtain internal company documents that reveal what the manufacturer knew about dangers, when they knew it, and what they did or failed to do. These documents may include design specifications, safety testing results, consumer complaints, internal communications about known problems, and decisions about cost-benefit analyses that prioritized profits over safety.
Many successful product defect cases turn on evidence that the company knew about the danger before the fatal accident but chose not to fix the problem or warn consumers. Discovery can take months or years in complex cases involving multiple defendants and massive document collections, but these records often contain the most damaging evidence against manufacturers.
Investigate Prior Incidents and Complaints
Researching whether others have been injured or killed by the same product strengthens your case by showing a pattern of danger rather than an isolated incident. Attorneys search federal databases including CPSC complaints, FDA adverse event reports, NHTSA defect reports, and prior lawsuits involving the same product. These prior incidents demonstrate that the company knew or should have known about the defect and had opportunities to prevent your family member’s death.
If the company issued recalls or safety warnings after your loved one died, that evidence can prove the company eventually admitted the product was dangerous. The timing of recalls and warnings compared to when your family member died becomes critical evidence of what the company knew and when they knew it.
Strict Liability vs. Negligence in Arizona Product Defect Cases
Arizona law allows defective product claims to proceed under either strict liability or negligence theories, and understanding the difference affects how cases are proven and defended.
Strict liability means the plaintiff doesn’t need to prove the manufacturer was careless or violated any duty of care. The focus is entirely on the condition of the product itself—was it unreasonably dangerous when it left the defendant’s control? If the product was defective and that defect caused the death, liability attaches regardless of how careful the manufacturer was or how much testing they conducted. This legal principle recognizes that manufacturers are better positioned than consumers to prevent defects and should bear the cost of injuries caused by their products regardless of fault.
Negligence claims, in contrast, focus on the defendant’s conduct rather than just the product’s condition. To prove negligence, the plaintiff must show the defendant owed a duty of care (which manufacturers always do), breached that duty by acting unreasonably, and that breach caused the death. Negligence claims may address inadequate testing, failure to fix known problems, insufficient quality control, or failure to warn about dangers the company knew or should have known existed. While strict liability focuses on “what was wrong with the product,” negligence asks “what did the company do wrong.”
Most defective product wrongful death cases plead both theories because strict liability may be easier to prove in some situations while negligence better explains the company’s culpable conduct in others. Strict liability can apply even when the manufacturer followed all regulations and industry standards if the product was still unreasonably dangerous. Negligence claims can add punitive damages potential in egregious cases and may reach conduct beyond the product itself, such as fraudulent concealment of known dangers.
Challenges in Defective Product Wrongful Death Cases
These cases involve unique obstacles that make experienced legal representation essential for families seeking justice.
Corporate Resources and Defense Strategies – Major manufacturers and their insurers employ teams of lawyers and experts specifically to defend product liability claims. They have nearly unlimited resources to fight cases through years of litigation, conduct extensive discovery, and file numerous motions designed to dismiss cases or limit evidence. Companies may argue the product was misused, altered after purchase, or that the death resulted from other causes. Overcoming these well-funded defenses requires attorneys with equal expertise and resources to match corporate legal teams.
Technical Complexity – Proving a product defect often requires understanding engineering principles, manufacturing processes, material science, and industry standards that are far beyond common knowledge. Attorneys must work with experts to translate complex technical issues into clear explanations juries can understand and apply. Cases involving medical devices or pharmaceuticals add additional layers of complexity requiring knowledge of human physiology, pharmacology, and medical research standards.
Competing Causes – Defense attorneys routinely argue that something other than the product defect caused the death. They may point to the deceased person’s actions, other products involved in the incident, environmental factors, or pre-existing health conditions. Families must prove through evidence and expert testimony that the product defect was a substantial factor in causing death, even if other factors also contributed. Arizona law doesn’t require proof that the defect was the only cause, but establishing causation with scientific certainty remains a major challenge.
Federal Preemption Issues – Some product categories are heavily regulated by federal agencies like the FDA, CPSC, or NHTSA. Defendants sometimes argue that federal regulations preempt state law claims, meaning families cannot sue under Arizona law because federal law occupies the field. While preemption defenses fail in most product liability cases, they add complexity and require careful legal analysis of the relationship between federal regulations and state tort claims.
The Wrongful Death Lawsuit Process for Product Defect Cases
Understanding the litigation timeline helps families prepare for the months or years these cases can require to reach resolution.
File the Complaint in Superior Court
The case begins when an attorney files a complaint in Maricopa County Superior Court naming the defendants and describing the defective product, how it caused death, and the damages suffered. The complaint identifies the legal theories (strict liability, negligence, breach of warranty) and the specific defect type. Defendants must be properly served with the complaint and have time to respond, typically 20 days for Arizona defendants or 30 days for out-of-state companies.
Defendants usually file an answer denying liability and asserting various defenses, or they may file motions to dismiss arguing the complaint fails to state a valid claim. These early motions rarely succeed in legitimate product defect cases but can delay the case by several months while the court considers them.
Engage in Discovery and Evidence Exchange
Discovery is the longest phase of most product liability cases, often lasting a year or more. Both sides exchange written questions (interrogatories), requests for documents, and requests for admissions. Depositions allow attorneys to question witnesses, company representatives, and experts under oath before trial. Your attorney will depose company engineers, safety personnel, and executives to lock in their testimony and uncover helpful admissions.
Expert witnesses prepare detailed reports explaining their opinions about the defect and causation. The defense will hire their own experts who disagree with your experts, setting up a battle of competing technical evidence. Discovery often reveals internal company documents that become the most powerful evidence of corporate knowledge and indifference to safety.
Attempt Settlement Negotiations or Mediation
Most product defect wrongful death cases settle before trial because both sides face significant risks. Defendants want to avoid public trials that could expose damaging evidence and lead to larger verdicts. Families want to avoid the stress and uncertainty of trial while securing compensation without additional years of litigation. After discovery reveals the strength of evidence, parties typically engage in settlement negotiations either directly or through mediation.
Mediation involves a neutral third party who helps facilitate settlement discussions but doesn’t impose a decision. The mediator meets with both sides, evaluates the case strengths and weaknesses, and works toward a mutually acceptable resolution. Strong cases with clear evidence of defects and substantial damages often settle during or after mediation when defendants realize trial poses too great a risk.
Proceed to Trial if Settlement Fails
If settlement negotiations fail, the case proceeds to jury trial. Product liability trials can last several weeks given the technical evidence and multiple experts on both sides. Your attorney presents evidence of the defect, the causation between the defect and death, and the damages your family has suffered. The defense presents its evidence attempting to show the product was safe, properly designed, or that other factors caused the death.
The jury deliberates and returns a verdict on both liability and damages. If the jury finds for your family, they award specific dollar amounts for economic and non-economic damages. Defendants often appeal adverse verdicts, which can add another year or more to the case. If the jury finds for the defense, the case ends unless grounds exist for appeal of legal errors during trial.
Why Defective Product Cases Require Specialized Legal Knowledge
Product liability wrongful death cases differ significantly from other wrongful death claims and require attorneys with specific experience in this area of law.
Product defect litigation involves complex legal doctrines including the risk-utility test for design defects, the consumer expectations test, and the learned intermediary doctrine in pharmaceutical cases. Attorneys must understand federal and state product safety regulations, industry standards, and the intersection of multiple areas of law. They need relationships with qualified expert witnesses in engineering, accident reconstruction, and relevant scientific fields who can credibly testify about defects.
These cases require significant financial resources to investigate thoroughly, hire multiple experts, conduct extensive discovery, and litigate against well-funded corporate defendants over months or years. Many personal injury attorneys lack the specialized knowledge and resources these cases demand. Choosing an attorney who regularly handles product liability wrongful death cases makes the difference between cases that settle for full value and cases that fail due to inadequate investigation or preparation.
How Life Justice Law Group Can Help Your Family
At Life Justice Law Group, we understand that no amount of money replaces your loved one or fills the void their death has left in your family. However, financial compensation provides stability for your future and holds negligent manufacturers accountable for placing profits above human life.
Our attorneys have extensive experience with both product liability and wrongful death law. We work with leading experts nationwide to investigate defects, prove causation, and build compelling cases that achieve results. We handle all aspects of your case while keeping you informed and involved in major decisions. Our goal is to maximize your recovery while minimizing the additional stress legal proceedings place on grieving families.
We represent Chandler families on a contingency fee basis, which means you pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. We advance all case costs including expert fees, court costs, and investigation expenses, and we only recover these costs if your case succeeds. You risk nothing by calling us to discuss your potential claim.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do I have to file a wrongful death lawsuit for a defective product in Arizona?
Arizona’s wrongful death statute of limitations gives you two years from the date of death to file a lawsuit under A.R.S. § 12-542. This deadline is strictly enforced, and missing it means losing your right to pursue compensation forever regardless of how strong your case is. However, identifying the responsible parties and gathering evidence takes time, especially in product defect cases that require expert analysis. Consulting an attorney within weeks or months of the death rather than waiting until the deadline approaches protects your legal rights and ensures evidence is preserved while memories are fresh and physical evidence is still available.
Can I file a claim if my family member was partly at fault for the accident?
Arizona follows comparative fault principles, which means your recovery may be reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the deceased, but you can still recover if the deceased was less than 100% at fault. For example, if the defective product was 80% responsible for the death and your family member’s actions were 20% responsible, your damages would be reduced by 20%. However, product liability’s strict liability doctrine often means the deceased person’s conduct is less relevant than in negligence cases. Courts recognize that products should be safe even when used in reasonably foreseeable ways that might not follow instructions perfectly, so partial fault doesn’t necessarily prevent recovery in defective product cases.
What if the manufacturer is located in another state or country?
You can still file your wrongful death lawsuit in Arizona if the death occurred here or if the deceased lived here, even if the manufacturer is based elsewhere. Arizona courts have jurisdiction over out-of-state and foreign manufacturers whose products are sold and cause harm in Arizona. Your attorney will properly serve the manufacturer under Arizona’s long-arm jurisdiction statute and federal rules for serving foreign corporations. Many major manufacturers already do substantial business in Arizona, which strengthens jurisdiction arguments. The manufacturer’s location doesn’t prevent you from pursuing justice in Arizona courts where your family suffered the loss.
Will my case definitely go to trial or can it settle?
Most defective product wrongful death cases settle before trial, often after discovery reveals the strength of evidence but before the time and expense of trial. Manufacturers usually prefer settling for a negotiated amount rather than risking a jury trial that could result in a larger verdict and negative publicity. However, settlement isn’t guaranteed, and defendants sometimes refuse reasonable offers forcing families to trial. Your attorney should be fully prepared to try your case while simultaneously pursuing settlement opportunities. The decision to accept a settlement offer ultimately belongs to you, and your attorney will provide guidance on whether offers adequately compensate your family for your losses.
Can I afford to hire a Chandler defective product wrongful death attorney?
Life Justice Law Group handles wrongful death cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay no attorney fees unless we win your case and recover compensation. We advance all costs of litigation including expert witness fees, court filing fees, deposition costs, and investigation expenses. You are never asked to pay anything out of pocket during your case. If we don’t win, you owe nothing for our attorney fees or the costs we advanced. This arrangement allows families to pursue justice against wealthy manufacturers regardless of the family’s financial situation, and it means your attorney has a strong incentive to maximize your recovery since our fee is a percentage of what we obtain for you.
What types of damages can I recover in a wrongful death product liability case?
Arizona law allows recovery of economic damages including all medical expenses related to the final injury, funeral and burial costs, and the full value of lost income and benefits your loved one would have earned over their expected working life. Non-economic damages compensate for loss of companionship, comfort, love, guidance, and the emotional pain your family suffers from losing your loved one. The specific damages available depend on your relationship to the deceased—spouses and children typically recover both economic and non-economic damages, while parents of adult children may be limited to certain categories. Arizona does not permit punitive damages in wrongful death actions under A.R.S. § 12-613, but your attorney may pursue a separate survival action through the estate that could include punitive damages if the defendant’s conduct was particularly egregious.
How do I prove the product was defective and caused my family member’s death?
Proving a product defect requires expert testimony in nearly all cases because juries cannot determine whether a product’s design or manufacture was defective without technical expertise beyond common knowledge. Your attorney will retain engineers, scientists, or other relevant experts who examine the product, review its design and manufacturing specifications, test similar products, and form opinions about whether defects existed and caused the fatal injuries. Medical experts establish the cause of death and link it to the product rather than other possible causes. Attorneys also obtain internal company documents through discovery that may reveal the manufacturer knew about the defect before your family member died. The combination of physical evidence, expert opinions, and corporate documents builds the proof needed to establish defect and causation.
What happens to the compensation awarded in a wrongful death case?
Arizona law specifies how wrongful death proceeds are distributed based on who brings the case and who survives the deceased. If a spouse files the claim, the spouse receives the entire award unless there are minor children, in which case the court may allocate a portion to the children. If adult children bring the claim, they share the proceeds equally unless they agree otherwise. The court has authority to determine fair distribution if disputes arise among family members. Wrongful death damages belong to the family members who suffered the loss rather than to the deceased person’s estate, which means these funds typically don’t go through probate and aren’t used to pay the deceased person’s debts. Survival action damages, if pursued, do go to the estate and may be used to satisfy estate obligations before distribution to heirs.
Contact a Chandler Defective Product Wrongful Death Lawyer Today
Losing a family member to a defective product leaves you with grief, financial uncertainty, and questions about justice and accountability. While no legal outcome can restore your loved one, pursuing a wrongful death claim serves multiple important purposes: it provides financial resources your family needs to move forward, it holds negligent manufacturers responsible for choosing profits over safety, and it may prevent future deaths by forcing companies to fix dangerous products or remove them from the market.
Life Justice Law Group provides compassionate, skilled representation to Chandler families dealing with wrongful death caused by defective products. We offer free consultations where we listen to what happened, answer your questions, explain your legal options, and help you make informed decisions about how to proceed. We work on a contingency fee basis, meaning your family pays no attorney fees unless we successfully recover compensation. Call (480) 378-8088 today to speak with a Chandler defective product wrongful death lawyer who will fight for justice and fair compensation for your family.