How Are Wrongful Death Settlements Calculated in Arizona?

TL;DR

In Arizona, wrongful death settlements are calculated by adding together two main types of compensation: economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages cover measurable financial losses like the deceased’s lost future income, medical bills from the final injury, and funeral expenses. Non-economic damages compensate for intangible losses, such as the family’s grief, sorrow, and the loss of companionship. Arizona’s Constitution prohibits any caps on these damages, so the final settlement amount depends on the specific facts of the case, the strength of the evidence, and the outcome of negotiations with insurance companies or a jury’s decision at trial.

Key Highlights

• Economic Damages: These are the quantifiable financial losses, including lost wages, benefits, inheritance, and the value of household services the deceased provided.
• Non-Economic Damages: This category covers the profound emotional and personal losses suffered by the surviving family members, like mental anguish and loss of love, care, and guidance.
• No Damage Caps: Article 2, Section 31 of the Arizona Constitution explicitly forbids the legislature from passing any law that limits the amount of damages that can be recovered for causing a person’s death.
• Eligible Claimants: A wrongful death claim can only be filed by a surviving spouse, child, parent, or the personal representative of the deceased’s estate.
• Expert Projections: Financial experts and economists are often used to project the deceased’s future earning capacity and other financial contributions over their expected lifetime.
• Comparative Fault: If the deceased person is found to be partially at fault for the incident that caused their death, the settlement amount will be reduced by their percentage of fault.

Losing a family member due to someone else’s negligence or wrongful act creates a profound and permanent void. In Arizona, the legal system provides a specific civil action to hold the responsible party accountable and secure financial stability for the surviving family. According to the Arizona Department of Health Services, unintentional injuries, including motor vehicle collisions and falls, are a leading cause of death in the state. When these fatal incidents are caused by another’s carelessness, the law offers a path for recourse.

This legal path is defined by a set of state laws, primarily the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 12-611 through § 12-613. These statutes establish what constitutes a wrongful death, who is legally entitled to file a claim, and what types of compensation, known as damages, can be recovered. Unlike some other states, Arizona’s constitution provides a powerful protection for victims by prohibiting any legislative caps on damages in wrongful death cases. This means that a jury or a settlement negotiation has the freedom to determine a figure that truly reflects the full scope of the family’s loss.

Calculating a settlement is not about assigning a monetary value to a human life. Instead, it is a methodical process designed to quantify the financial and emotional devastation a family endures. The calculation considers what the deceased would have contributed financially over a lifetime and attempts to acknowledge the immense personal suffering of the survivors. The following sections break down this complex calculation, explaining each component that contributes to the final settlement amount in an Arizona wrongful death claim.

Get the compensation your family deserves, speak with Life Justice Law Group now.

Who is Entitled to a Wrongful Death Settlement in Arizona?

Before any calculations can begin, the first critical step is to determine who has the legal standing to bring a wrongful death claim. Arizona law is very specific about this. A.R.S. § 12-612 clearly outlines the individuals who are permitted to file a lawsuit on behalf of all beneficiaries. This is not an open-ended list; only certain relationships to the deceased are recognized for this purpose.

Primary Beneficiaries

The statute gives priority to the closest surviving family members. The action can be brought by and for the benefit of:

• The Surviving Spouse: The husband or wife of the deceased has a primary right to file a claim.
• The Surviving Children: This includes both biological and legally adopted children. They are considered direct beneficiaries who have lost the financial support, guidance, and love of a parent.
• A Surviving Parent or Guardian: If the deceased has no surviving spouse or children, their mother, father, or legal guardian can file the claim. This is most common in cases involving the death of a minor or a young, unmarried adult.

It is important to understand that only one of these parties needs to file the lawsuit. For example, if a surviving spouse files the claim, it is done on behalf of themselves and any surviving children. The settlement or jury award is then distributed among all statutory beneficiaries, with the court often approving the final allocation to ensure it is fair.

The Role of the Personal Representative

What happens if none of the individuals listed above are alive or able to file the claim? In that situation, Arizona law allows the personal representative of the deceased’s estate to file the wrongful death action. The personal representative, also known as an executor, is the person named in the deceased’s will or appointed by the court to manage their final affairs.

When the personal representative files the claim, they do so on behalf of the estate. Any damages recovered for the estate are then distributed to the beneficiaries named in the will or according to state intestacy laws if there was no will. This ensures that even if there are no immediate family members to file, the responsible party can still be held accountable.

What About Other Family Members?

The law is restrictive. Siblings, grandparents (unless they are legal guardians), cousins, or unmarried partners do not have the independent legal right to file a wrongful death claim in Arizona. While they may be suffering deeply from the loss, the statute limits the right to file to the spouse, children, parents, or personal representative. However, these other relatives could potentially receive a portion of the settlement if they are named as beneficiaries of the deceased’s estate and the claim is filed by the personal representative.

The Two Pillars of Compensation: Economic and Non-Economic Damages

Once it is established who can file the claim, the focus shifts to calculating the value of the losses. Under A.R.S. § 12-613, the jury (or the parties in a settlement negotiation) must determine “damages as are fair and just with reference to the injury resulting from the death to the surviving parties who may be entitled to recover.” These damages are broadly divided into two distinct categories: economic and non-economic.

Calculating Economic Damages: The Tangible Losses

Economic damages represent the direct, measurable financial losses that result from the death. These are the costs that can be calculated with receipts, pay stubs, and expert financial analysis. The goal is to restore the family to the financial position they would have been in had their loved one survived.

• Lost Income and Earning Capacity: This is often the largest component of economic damages. It includes not just the salary the person was earning at the time of their death but also their projected future earnings, raises, promotions, bonuses, and commissions over the course of their expected career.
• Loss of Benefits: The calculation also includes the value of lost employment benefits, such as health insurance coverage, retirement contributions (like 401(k) matches), and pension plans.
• Loss of Services: This component quantifies the monetary value of the tasks the deceased regularly performed for the household. This can include childcare, cooking, cleaning, home repairs, yard work, financial management, and transportation. The cost to hire someone to perform these services is used to calculate this value.
• Loss of Inheritance: This represents the amount of money the deceased would have likely accumulated and left to their heirs as an inheritance had they lived a full life.
• Medical Expenses: Any medical bills incurred for the treatment of the deceased’s final injury, from the time of the incident until their death, are recoverable.
• Funeral and Burial Expenses: The reasonable costs of the funeral service, cremation or burial, and other final arrangements are included.

Valuing Non-Economic Damages: The Intangible Impact

Non-economic damages are intended to compensate the surviving family members for the profound, personal, and non-financial losses they have suffered. While no amount of money can truly compensate for these losses, the legal system uses monetary awards to acknowledge their severity.

• Sorrow, Grief, and Mental Anguish of the Survivors: This addresses the deep emotional suffering, depression, and mental pain experienced by the spouse, children, and parents.
• Loss of Companionship, Comfort, and Guidance: This damage category recognizes the loss of the relationship itself. For a spouse, it is the loss of a partner and companion. For a child, it is the loss of a parent’s love, guidance, and support through life’s milestones. For a parent, it is the loss of a child’s affection and presence.
• Loss of Consortium: This is a specific claim typically made by the surviving spouse. It refers to the loss of love, affection, solace, and sexual intimacy that was part of the marital relationship.
• Pain and Suffering of the Deceased: In some cases, a “survival action” can be joined with the wrongful death claim. A survival action allows the estate to recover damages for the conscious pain and suffering the deceased person experienced before they died. This requires evidence that the person was aware of their injuries and suffered between the time of the incident and their passing.

Because Arizona has no caps on damages, a jury has wide discretion in awarding non-economic damages based on the testimony of family and friends about the nature of their relationship with the deceased and the impact the loss has had on their lives.

How Future Earnings and Financial Contributions Are Projected

Calculating the value of a person’s lost future income is one of the most technical aspects of a wrongful death settlement. It is not as simple as multiplying their last annual salary by the number of years they had until retirement. A much more detailed and evidence-based approach is required, which almost always involves the testimony of a financial expert.

The Role of the Forensic Economist

In wrongful death cases, attorneys will hire a forensic economist to analyze all relevant financial data and create a comprehensive report on the total economic loss. This expert acts as an impartial analyst who projects the deceased’s likely financial trajectory. They consider numerous factors to build a realistic model of what the person would have earned and contributed to their family.

Key Factors in the Projection

The forensic economist’s report will be based on a deep analysis of several key data points:

• Age and Health: The deceased’s age, general health, and life expectancy before the fatal incident are the starting points for determining their work-life expectancy.
• Education and Skills: Their level of education, professional licenses, specialized training, and unique skills all play a role in projecting their potential for career advancement and higher earnings.
• Income History: The economist will review past tax returns, W-2s, and pay stubs to establish a baseline earnings history and identify patterns of growth.
• Profession and Industry Trends: The expert will consider the typical career path for someone in the deceased’s profession. They will analyze industry-wide data on salary growth, promotion potential, and overall economic stability for that field.
• Personal Consumption: The calculation is not based on gross income. The economist will deduct the amount the deceased would have spent on their own personal needs (food, clothing, personal expenses) to arrive at the net financial loss to the family.

Discounting to Present Value

A settlement or verdict is paid as a single lump sum, but the lost income would have been earned over many decades. To account for this, the total projected future earnings are “discounted to present value.” This is a financial concept that calculates how much money would need to be invested today to generate the stream of income the family has lost over time. The discount rate is based on factors like inflation and safe investment returns. This complex calculation ensures the family receives a fair amount that accurately reflects their long-term loss in today’s dollars.

The Impact of Comparative Fault on Your Settlement

In an ideal world, the at-fault party would be 100% responsible for the incident. However, in reality, the circumstances are often more complex. Arizona law addresses situations where the deceased person may have shared some responsibility for the incident that led to their death. This is handled through a legal doctrine known as “pure comparative fault.”

What is Pure Comparative Fault?

Arizona’s pure comparative fault rule, established in A.R.S. § 12-2505, states that a claimant’s recovery is reduced in proportion to their degree of fault. The “pure” part of the rule means that a family can recover damages even if the deceased was found to be 99% at fault for the incident. Their recovery would simply be reduced by 99%. This differs from other states that have a “modified” comparative fault rule, which bars any recovery if the claimant is 50% or 51% or more at fault.

How the Deceased’s Actions Can Affect the Settlement

The application of this rule can have a significant impact on the final settlement amount. Here is a practical example:

• Imagine a fatal car crash where the total damages are calculated to be $2 million.
• During the investigation, evidence shows that while the other driver ran a red light, the deceased was driving 10 miles per hour over the speed limit.
• A jury determines that the other driver was 80% at fault, but the deceased’s speeding contributed 20% to the severity of the crash.
• Under the pure comparative fault rule, the $2 million award would be reduced by the deceased’s 20% share of fault.
• The final amount the family could recover would be $1,600,000 ($2,000,000 – 20%).

The Defendant’s Strategy

Because of this rule, a common strategy for defense attorneys and insurance companies is to shift as much blame as possible onto the deceased. They will scrutinize every detail of the incident to find any evidence that suggests the deceased acted carelessly. Arguing comparative fault is one of the most effective ways for them to reduce their financial liability, making it a central point of contention in many settlement negotiations and trials.

Punitive Damages: When Are They Awarded in Arizona?

The damages discussed so far, economic and non-economic, are known as compensatory damages. Their purpose is to compensate the family for their losses. However, in rare cases, an additional category of damages may be awarded: punitive damages.

The Purpose of Punitive Damages

Punitive damages are not designed to compensate the victims. Instead, their purpose is to punish the defendant for extremely reckless or malicious behavior and to deter similar conduct by others in the future. They are reserved for cases where the defendant’s actions go far beyond simple negligence.

The High Standard of Proof

To be awarded punitive damages in Arizona, the plaintiff must prove with “clear and convincing evidence” that the defendant’s conduct was grossly negligent or intentionally harmful. The plaintiff must show that the defendant acted with an “evil mind.” This legal standard means the defendant knew their actions were wrong and created a substantial risk of harm to others, but they proceeded anyway with a conscious disregard for the safety and lives of others.

Examples of Cases Warranting Punitive Damages

Simple carelessness, like a driver who gets distracted and causes a crash, will not meet this standard. Punitive damages are typically considered in situations involving egregious misconduct, such as:

• A drunk driver with a history of multiple DUI convictions who causes a fatal collision.
• A manufacturing company that knows its product has a deadly defect but chooses to hide the information from the public to protect its profits.
• A trucking company that forces its drivers to violate federal hours-of-service regulations to meet deadlines, leading to a fatigue-related fatal crash.

Because the standard of proof is so high, punitive damages are not a factor in most wrongful death settlement calculations. They are sought only in the most extreme cases and are awarded entirely at the discretion of the jury.

The Settlement Process: From Claim to Compensation

Understanding the components of a settlement is one part of the equation. It is also helpful to know the practical steps involved in moving a claim from an initial investigation to a final payment. The vast majority of wrongful death cases are resolved through a settlement, avoiding the time, expense, and emotional strain of a full trial.

Investigation and Evidence Gathering

The process begins with a thorough investigation. This involves collecting all available evidence to establish liability and document damages. This evidence includes:

• Official reports (police reports, accident reconstruction reports, OSHA reports).
• Medical records and the coroner’s report.
• Witness statements and interviews.
• Photographs and video footage of the scene.
• Employment records, tax returns, and financial documents.
• Expert reports from economists, medical professionals, and accident reconstructionists.

The Demand Letter

Once the evidence is gathered and the full extent of the damages has been calculated, the family’s attorney will draft a comprehensive demand letter. This formal document is sent to the at-fault party’s insurance company. It lays out the facts of the case, explains why their insured is legally liable, and presents a detailed breakdown of the economic and non-economic damages being claimed. The letter concludes with a specific monetary demand for settlement.

Negotiation with the Insurance Company

The receipt of the demand letter typically opens a period of negotiation. The insurance adjuster will review the letter, conduct their own investigation, and respond with a counteroffer, which is almost always significantly lower than the amount demanded. This initiates a back-and-forth process where both sides present arguments, share additional evidence, and attempt to reach a mutually agreeable settlement figure. The strength of the evidence and the skill of the negotiator are critical during this phase.

Mediation and Litigation

If direct negotiations reach an impasse, the next step may be mediation. In mediation, a neutral third-party mediator helps facilitate a discussion between the family and the insurance company to find common ground and broker a settlement. Mediation is non-binding, but it is often successful in resolving disputes.

If a settlement still cannot be reached, the final step is to file a lawsuit and proceed with litigation. While this moves the case toward a trial, settlement negotiations can, and often do continue throughout the litigation process. Many cases settle shortly before the trial date, as the prospect of an unpredictable jury verdict provides a powerful incentive for both sides to find a resolution.

Need help understanding your settlement? Contact Life Justice Law Group today.

Conclusion

The calculation of a wrongful death settlement in Arizona is a detailed and methodical process rooted in state law and legal precedent. It involves a comprehensive evaluation of both concrete financial losses and profound emotional suffering. The final figure is a combination of economic damages, which include lost lifetime earnings and benefits, and non-economic damages, which acknowledge the family’s grief and loss of companionship. Arizona’s constitutional ban on damage caps ensures that families have the opportunity to receive full and fair compensation that truly reflects the extent of their loss.

Several key factors, such as the projection of future income by financial experts and the application of Arizona’s pure comparative fault rule, can significantly influence the final settlement amount. While the process can seem complex, its purpose is clear: to provide the financial resources the deceased would have provided and to hold the responsible party accountable for their actions. This legal framework is designed to secure a measure of justice and stability for families during an incredibly difficult time.

The value of a wrongful death claim is not determined by an online calculator or a simple formula. It is established through a rigorous process of investigation, expert analysis, and skilled advocacy. If your family is facing this tragic situation, understanding your legal rights and the potential value of your claim is a critical first step. Seeking guidance from a qualified Arizona wrongful death attorney can ensure that your case is properly evaluated and that you are positioned to secure the financial support your family needs and deserves. Contact us for free evaluation today, and let us fight for the justice your family deserves.