TL;DR
Yes, in Arizona, it is possible to seek compensation for the pain and suffering a person experienced before they died due to someone else’s negligence or wrongful act. This is achieved through a legal claim known as a “survival action,” which is filed by the deceased person’s estate. A survival action is distinct from a wrongful death claim; it allows the estate to recover damages the deceased would have been entitled to if they had survived, including compensation for their conscious pain, suffering, and fear before their passing.
Key Highlights
- Survival Action: This is the legal mechanism in Arizona (under A.R.S. § 14-3110) that allows a personal injury claim to continue after the victim has died.
- Who Files: The personal representative of the deceased’s estate is the only party authorized to file a survival action.
- What It Covers: This action seeks damages for the deceased’s pre-death suffering, lost wages before death, and medical expenses.
- Difference from Wrongful Death: A wrongful death claim compensates surviving family members for their own losses (like loss of companionship and financial support), while a survival action compensates the estate for the deceased’s losses.
- No Damage Caps: Arizona’s Constitution prohibits placing caps on damages for personal injury or death, including pain and suffering.
Each year, preventable incidents result in thousands of fatalities across Arizona. According to the Arizona Department of Transportation, there were 1,294 motor vehicle crash fatalities in 2022 alone. While statistics provide a broad overview, they cannot capture the individual stories of suffering that often precede these deaths. When a person is injured by another’s wrongful act and later succumbs to those injuries, a critical legal question arises for their family: What happens to the claim for the suffering the victim endured in their final hours, days, or weeks?
Arizona law provides a specific answer through a legal concept known as a “survival action.” Governed by Arizona Revised Statute § 14-3110, this law ensures that a person’s personal injury claim does not simply vanish upon their death. Instead, the claim “survives” and can be pursued by the personal representative of their estate. This is fundamentally different from a wrongful death claim, which is established under A.R.S. § 12-611 and is meant to compensate specific family members for their own personal losses stemming from the death. Understanding the distinction between these two types of claims is essential for families seeking justice.
This legal framework allows the deceased’s estate to stand in their shoes and demand accountability for the conscious pain and suffering they were forced to bear. The process involves demonstrating the extent of that suffering, calculating its value, and presenting a compelling case to an insurance company or a jury. For families left behind, pursuing a survival action is not just about financial recovery; it is about ensuring the full scope of the harm caused by a negligent party is recognized and addressed by the legal system.
Your loved one deserves justice. Reach out to Life Justice Law Group now.
Understanding Survival Actions vs. Wrongful Death Claims in Arizona
When a person dies due to the negligence of another, Arizona law permits two separate and distinct types of legal claims to be brought. These are often confused, but they serve different purposes, benefit different parties, and cover different types of damages. The two claims are the survival action and the wrongful death claim. A clear understanding of each is the first step in ensuring all legal rights are protected.
The Purpose of a Survival Action
A survival action is essentially the personal injury lawsuit the deceased person could have filed if they had lived. The core idea is that the defendant’s wrongful act should not erase their liability for the victim’s suffering just because the victim died. The claim “survives” the death of the individual.
- Governing Statute: A.R.S. § 14-3110.
- Plaintiff: The claim is brought by the personal representative of the deceased person’s estate, on behalf of the estate itself.
- Damages Recovered: The damages are for the harm the deceased person personally experienced. This includes:
- Pain and Suffering: Compensation for the conscious physical pain, emotional distress, fear, and anxiety the deceased endured between the time of injury and the time of death.
- Medical Expenses: All medical bills incurred to treat the injuries from the incident until the moment of death.
- Lost Wages: Any income the deceased lost from being unable to work between the injury and their death.
- Punitive Damages: In cases of extreme or malicious conduct, the estate may be able to recover punitive damages intended to punish the wrongdoer.
The money recovered in a successful survival action goes directly to the deceased’s estate. From there, it is used to pay any outstanding debts of the estate (like final medical bills or funeral expenses), and the remainder is distributed to the heirs according to the deceased’s will or, if there is no will, by Arizona’s intestacy laws.
The Purpose of a Wrongful Death Claim
A wrongful death claim, in contrast, is not about the deceased’s suffering. It is about the losses suffered by the surviving family members because of their loved one’s death. This claim is intended to compensate the family for the harm they have experienced.
- Governing Statute: A.R.S. § 12-612.
- Plaintiff: The claim can be brought by a surviving spouse, child, parent, guardian, or the personal representative of the estate on behalf of these beneficiaries.
- Damages Recovered: The damages are for the harm the surviving family members experienced. This includes:
- Loss of Love, Affection, and Companionship: Compensation for the loss of the relationship with the deceased.
- Pain, Grief, and Sorrow: Acknowledgment of the emotional toll the death has taken on the family.
- Loss of Financial Support: The value of the income and benefits the deceased would have provided to the family over their lifetime.
- Loss of Household Services: The value of the services the deceased provided, such as childcare, home maintenance, and other contributions.
The money recovered in a wrongful death claim is distributed directly to the statutory beneficiaries (the spouse, children, or parents) and does not become part of the deceased’s estate.
A Practical Example
Imagine a construction worker is severely injured when a crane operator negligently drops a heavy load. The worker is rushed to the hospital and remains in critical condition for two weeks, conscious and in significant pain, before passing away from his injuries.
- Survival Action: His estate, through a personal representative, could file a survival action to recover damages for the two weeks of intense pain and suffering he endured. The claim would also include the substantial medical bills from his hospital stay and any wages he lost during that two-week period.
- Wrongful Death Claim: His surviving spouse and children could file a separate wrongful death claim. This claim would seek compensation for their loss of his companionship, their grief, and the loss of his future income that would have supported the family for years to come.
In many cases, both a survival action and a wrongful death claim are filed concurrently as part of the same lawsuit, as they arise from the same negligent act.
Who is Eligible to File a Claim for the Deceased’s Suffering?
While surviving family members feel the loss most acutely, they are not the ones who can legally file a claim for the deceased’s own pain and suffering. That right belongs exclusively to the personal representative of the deceased person’s estate. This legal distinction is critical and often requires a formal court process to establish.
The Role of the Personal Representative
A personal representative, sometimes called an executor or administrator, is a person or institution appointed by a probate court to manage the final affairs of a deceased person. Their primary duty is to act in the best interest of the estate and its beneficiaries. This includes gathering assets, paying debts, and distributing the remaining property according to the deceased’s will or state law.
One of the key “assets” of an estate can be a legal claim, such as a survival action. The personal representative has the legal authority and responsibility to:
- Investigate the circumstances of the death.
- Hire a personal injury attorney to pursue the claim.
- File the lawsuit on behalf of the estate.
- Negotiate a settlement or take the case to trial.
- Collect any settlement or judgment funds.
How is a Personal Representative Appointed?
The process of appointing a personal representative typically happens through the probate court in the county where the deceased person lived.
- If There is a Will: If the deceased had a valid will, they likely nominated a person to serve as their personal representative (executor). This person petitions the court to be formally appointed. The court usually honors the deceased’s choice unless the nominated person is unwilling or legally unfit to serve.
- If There is No Will (Intestacy): When a person dies without a will, they are said to have died “intestate.” In this situation, Arizona law (A.R.S. § 14-3203) provides a priority list of individuals who can petition the court to be appointed as the personal representative. The order of priority is generally:
- The surviving spouse.
- An adult child of the deceased.
- A parent of the deceased.
- A sibling of the deceased.
- Other relatives.
- If no relatives are willing or able, the court can appoint a public fiduciary.
A family member who wishes to serve must file a petition with the probate court. The court will then hold a hearing to formally appoint them, granting them “Letters of Administration,” which is the legal document proving their authority to act for the estate.
Why This Formal Process Matters
The requirement for a court-appointed personal representative ensures that the claim is handled properly and that any recovered funds are distributed fairly. It prevents disputes among family members about who should control the lawsuit. Insurance companies and defendants will only negotiate with the legally appointed representative of the estate. Attempting to file a survival action without this legal authority will result in the case being dismissed.
For families dealing with a sudden loss, the probate process can seem like an added burden. However, it is a necessary legal step to unlock the ability to hold a negligent party accountable for the suffering their loved one endured. Consulting with an attorney who handles both personal injury and probate matters can streamline this process, allowing the family to focus on healing while the legal requirements are properly managed.
Proving the Deceased’s Pain and Suffering: Evidence and Documentation
The most challenging aspect of a survival action is proving the conscious pain and suffering of someone who is no longer able to testify for themselves. Unlike a wrongful death claim that focuses on the survivors’ grief, a survival action requires building a case around the victim’s experience between the moment of injury and their death. Success depends on gathering compelling evidence to paint a clear picture for an insurance adjuster or a jury of what the deceased went through.
The legal standard requires showing that the deceased was conscious for some period after the injury and experienced physical pain, emotional distress, or both. The more detailed and varied the evidence, the stronger the claim for damages will be.
Key Types of Evidence
1. Medical Records: This is the cornerstone of any survival action. Medical records provide an objective, chronological account of the victim’s condition. Important details to look for include:
- Physician and Nursing Notes: Descriptions of the patient’s consciousness level, reports of pain (using pain scales from 1-10), signs of distress like moaning or grimacing, and requests for pain medication.
- Medication Administration Records: A log of all pain medications given, including the type, dosage, and frequency. This demonstrates the level of pain management required.
- Diagnoses and Prognoses: Official records of the injuries sustained, surgical procedures performed, and the medical team’s assessment of the patient’s condition.
- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Reports: The ambulance or paramedic run sheets often contain the first medical observations of the victim’s state at the accident scene, including their level of consciousness and any statements they made.
2. Witness Testimony: Statements from people who were with the deceased after the injury are incredibly powerful. This can include:
- Family and Friends: Relatives who were at the hospital bedside can testify about what they saw and heard. Did the deceased talk about their pain? Did they appear frightened or anxious? Did they try to communicate non-verbally?
- First Responders and Bystanders: Police officers, firefighters, or civilians who were at the scene of the incident can describe the victim’s condition immediately after it happened. Testimony that the victim was conscious, screaming, or asking for help can be crucial.
- Medical Staff: While their notes are important, a deposition or trial testimony from a doctor or nurse can add a human element. They can explain the nature of the injuries and the typical level of pain associated with them.
3. Expert Witness Testimony: In many cases, an attorney will hire medical experts to review the records and provide a professional opinion. An expert can:
- Explain complex medical terminology to a jury in simple terms.
- Testify about the level of pain that is normally associated with the specific injuries the deceased suffered.
- Reconstruct the timeline of suffering based on the available evidence.
- Confirm that the victim was likely conscious and capable of experiencing pain and fear, even if they were unable to communicate clearly.
4. The Deceased’s Own Statements: Any words spoken by the deceased after the injury are extremely potent evidence. This could be statements made to a paramedic at the scene, a police officer, or a family member at the hospital. Statements like “It hurts so much,” “I’m scared,” or “Help me” directly convey their state of mind.
5. Photographic and Video Evidence: Visual evidence from the scene can help establish the severity of the impact or incident, which indirectly supports the claim for severe pain. Photos of the injuries, while graphic, can also be used to show the physical trauma the person endured.
Building a compelling case for pre-death pain and suffering requires a meticulous and proactive approach. An experienced attorney will know how to gather these different forms of evidence and weave them together into a coherent and persuasive narrative that honors the victim’s final experience.
How is Compensation for Pre-Death Pain and Suffering Calculated?
Placing a dollar value on a person’s suffering is one of the most difficult tasks in the legal system. There is no simple calculator or mathematical formula that can be applied. Unlike economic damages such as medical bills or lost wages, which are based on specific invoices and pay stubs, “pain and suffering” is a form of non-economic damage. Its value is subjective and must be determined by a jury or negotiated in a settlement based on the strength of the evidence.
Attorneys and insurance companies, however, use several factors and methods to arrive at a reasonable figure. The goal is to present a logical argument for a specific amount of compensation.
Factors That Influence the Value
The amount of compensation awarded in a survival action for pain and suffering depends heavily on the specific facts of the case. Key factors include:
- Duration of Suffering: How long did the person live between the time of injury and their death? A person who suffered for 30 minutes will generally have a lower value claim than someone who suffered for 30 days. The duration provides a timeframe for the suffering.
- Severity and Nature of the Injuries: The more painful the injuries, the higher the potential compensation. For example, severe burns, multiple fractures, or internal organ damage are recognized as causing extreme pain and will command a higher value than less severe injuries.
- Level of Consciousness: To recover for pain and suffering, the evidence must show the deceased was conscious and aware of their pain. If a victim was in a coma from the moment of impact until their death, a claim for conscious pain and suffering may not be possible. However, evidence of even brief periods of consciousness can support a claim.
- Degree of Emotional Distress: The claim is not just for physical pain. It also includes emotional and psychological trauma, such as fear, anxiety, and terror. For instance, a person trapped in a wrecked vehicle awaiting rescue likely experienced immense fear, which has significant value.
- Type of Medical Treatment: The nature of the medical interventions required can also illustrate the level of suffering. Undergoing multiple painful surgeries, intubation, or having chest tubes inserted are all experiences that contribute to the overall pain and suffering.
Common Valuation Methods (Used as Guidelines)
While a jury ultimately decides the amount, lawyers often use certain methods to frame their settlement demands. Two common approaches are:
1. The Per Diem (Per Day) Method: This method assigns a daily dollar amount to the suffering and multiplies it by the number of days the victim was alive and conscious after the injury. For example, an attorney might argue that the victim’s suffering was worth $1,000 per day. If the victim lived for 20 days after the accident, the demand for pain and suffering would be $20,000. The challenge is justifying the chosen daily rate. An attorney might base it on what the person would have earned per day at their job, arguing that enduring constant pain is at least as difficult as going to work.
2. The Multiplier Method: This method is more common in non-fatal personal injury cases but is sometimes used as a rough starting point in survival actions. It involves taking the total economic damages (medical bills and lost wages) and multiplying them by a number, typically between 1.5 and 5. The multiplier is chosen based on the severity of the injuries and the other factors listed above. For example, if the medical bills were $100,000 and the case involved extreme suffering, an attorney might use a multiplier of 4 to argue for $400,000 in pain and suffering damages.
These methods are not binding; they are simply tools used to start a negotiation. A skilled attorney will not rely on a formula alone. Instead, they will build a powerful narrative using the evidence to show a jury why a specific, substantial amount is a fair and just compensation for what the deceased was forced to endure.
Arizona’s Laws on Damage Caps and Statutes of Limitations
When pursuing a survival action in Arizona, two of the most important legal considerations are damage caps and the statute of limitations. These state-specific rules can have a profound impact on a family’s ability to recover compensation. Fortunately, Arizona’s laws are generally favorable to victims and their families in this regard.
No Caps on Compensatory Damages in Arizona
Many states have passed laws that place a “cap” or limit on the amount of money a jury can award for non-economic damages like pain and suffering. These laws are often the result of tort reform lobbying.
However, Arizona is different. The Arizona Constitution, in Article 2, Section 31, explicitly prohibits the legislature from passing any law that limits the amount of damages that can be recovered for causing the death or injury of a person. This constitutional protection is a powerful tool for victims and their estates.
This means that in Arizona, there is no cap on the amount of compensation a jury can award for the deceased’s pre-death pain and suffering. The amount awarded is determined solely by the evidence presented and the jury’s assessment of what is fair and reasonable under the circumstances. This allows for substantial awards in cases involving prolonged and intense suffering, ensuring that the full measure of the harm can be recognized.
The Statute of Limitations: A Strict Deadline
While there are no caps on damages, there is a very strict deadline for filing a lawsuit. This deadline is known as the statute of limitations. If a claim is not filed in court before the statute of limitations expires, the right to sue is permanently lost, regardless of how strong the case is.
For a survival action in Arizona, the relevant statute of limitations is found in A.R.S. § 12-542. It states that an action for personal injury must be filed within two years.
- When Does the Clock Start? The two-year clock generally begins to run from the date the injury occurred. This is a critical point. The clock does not start from the date of death. It starts from the date of the incident that caused the fatal injuries.
- Example: If a person is injured in a car crash on March 1, 2023, and dies from those injuries on March 15, 2023, the lawsuit must be filed by March 1, 2025.
Exceptions to the Rule: There are a few limited exceptions that can “toll” or pause the statute of limitations, but relying on them is risky. Some potential exceptions include:
- Discovery Rule: In some cases, the clock may not start until the injury is discovered or reasonably should have been discovered. This is more common in medical malpractice cases than in typical accident cases.
- Claims Against Government Entities: If the claim is against a city, state, or other public entity, the rules are different and much shorter. A “Notice of Claim” must be filed within just 180 days of the incident, and the lawsuit must be filed within one year.
Because the deadline is so absolute, it is vital for the family of a deceased person to contact an attorney as soon as possible. An attorney can ensure that the necessary legal steps, including opening an estate and filing the lawsuit, are completed well before the two-year deadline expires. Waiting too long can unfortunately close the door to justice.
The Role of Punitive Damages in Arizona Survival Actions
In most personal injury and survival action cases, the compensation awarded is “compensatory,” meaning it is intended to compensate the victim or their estate for their losses (like medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering). However, in a small subset of cases where the defendant’s conduct was particularly egregious, the estate may also be able to seek punitive damages.
Punitive damages are not designed to compensate for a loss. Instead, their purpose is twofold:
- To punish the wrongdoer for their outrageous conduct.
- To deter the wrongdoer and others from engaging in similar conduct in the future.
Because they are meant as a punishment, the legal standard for awarding punitive damages in Arizona is much higher than the standard for proving simple negligence.
The “Evil Mind” Standard
To be awarded punitive damages, the plaintiff (the estate) must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant acted with an “evil mind.” This is a higher burden of proof than the “preponderance of the evidence” standard used for compensatory damages.
An “evil mind” does not necessarily mean the defendant acted with spite or a desire to harm the victim, although that would certainly qualify. It can also be shown if the defendant’s actions demonstrated a conscious and deliberate disregard for a substantial and unjustifiable risk of significant harm to others.
Examples of conduct that might meet the “evil mind” standard include:
- An extremely intoxicated driver who causes a fatal crash after having multiple prior DUI convictions. Their decision to drive while severely impaired shows a conscious disregard for the safety of everyone else on the road.
- A manufacturing company that knows its product has a dangerous defect that could cause death but chooses to hide the defect from the public to save money on a recall.
- An intentional assault where the perpetrator’s goal was to cause serious harm, which ultimately led to the victim’s death.
- A trucking company that knowingly forces its drivers to violate federal safety regulations regarding driving hours and vehicle maintenance, leading to a fatal fatigue-related accident.
Proving the Defendant’s State of Mind
Proving what was in a defendant’s mind is challenging. It requires an in-depth investigation to uncover evidence that shows their conduct was more than just a mistake or momentary carelessness. This could involve:
- Reviewing the defendant’s past history (e.g., prior DUIs, safety violations).
- Obtaining internal company documents, emails, or memos.
- Taking depositions of the defendant and their associates to question them about their decisions and knowledge of the risks involved.
While punitive damages are not awarded in every case, they are an important tool in Arizona’s legal system for holding the most reckless and malicious actors accountable. When the facts support it, pursuing a claim for punitive damages in a survival action can send a powerful message that such behavior will not be tolerated in the community.
Seek fair compensation, contact Life Justice Law Group today.
Conclusion
When a loved one’s life is cut short by another’s negligence, the pain felt by the family is profound. Arizona’s legal system provides a path to hold the responsible parties accountable not only for the family’s loss but also for the suffering the victim personally endured before their death. A survival action, brought by the estate, is the specific legal tool designed to secure compensation for this pre-death pain, fear, and emotional distress. This claim stands separate from a wrongful death action, which compensates survivors for their own grief and financial losses.
Successfully pursuing a survival action requires a deep understanding of the law and a meticulous approach to gathering evidence. It is essential to prove that the deceased was conscious and aware of their suffering, a task that relies on a careful analysis of medical records, witness statements, and expert testimony. Arizona’s Constitution provides a significant advantage by prohibiting any caps on damages, allowing a jury to award an amount that truly reflects the severity of the victim’s experience. However, the strict two-year statute of limitations from the date of the injury imposes a firm deadline that cannot be missed.
If you are a representative of an estate for someone whose death was caused by another’s wrongful act, it is critical to understand your legal options. The complexities of opening an estate, filing the correct legal claims, and proving damages demand professional guidance. Taking action quickly is the best way to preserve the estate’s right to seek justice. To ensure the full scope of your loved one’s suffering is recognized, contact a qualified Arizona personal injury attorney to discuss the specific circumstances of your case and learn how to move forward. Contact us for free evaluation today, and let us fight for the justice your family deserves.