How Insurance Companies Value Wrongful Death Claims

TL;DR

Insurance companies value wrongful death claims by calculating two primary categories of damages: economic and non-economic. Economic damages are the tangible financial losses, including the deceased’s projected lifetime income, lost benefits,  medical bills, and funeral expenses. Non-economic damages represent the intangible human losses, such as the loss of companionship, parental guidance, emotional support, and the survivors’ suffering. The final valuation is then adjusted based on critical factors like the clarity of the at-fault party’s liability, the deceased’s age and health, the number of dependents, and the absolute ceiling set by the applicable insurance policy limits.

Key Highlights

  • Calculate Economic Losses: The process starts by adding up all calculable financial losses, primarily lost future earnings, which often requires an economic expert.
  • Assess Non-Economic Damages: A more subjective valuation is placed on the loss of the relationship, support, and companionship the deceased provided to their family.
  • Determine Liability: The claim’s value is reduced if the deceased person is found to be partially at fault for the incident, based on state-specific comparative fault laws.
  • Review Policy Limits: The maximum payout is strictly capped by the at-fault party’s insurance policy coverage, regardless of the claim’s calculated worth.
  • Consider Jurisdictional Laws: Each state has specific statutes that define who is eligible to file a claim and which types of damages are permitted for recovery.

Introduction

Each year, tens of thousands of American families are confronted with a sudden, preventable loss. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), unintentional injuries are a leading cause of death in the United States, with incidents ranging from motor vehicle collisions to medical errors. When such a death is caused by the negligence or wrongful act of another person or entity, the surviving family members may be entitled to file a wrongful death claim to seek financial compensation for their profound loss.

This type of legal action is a civil claim, completely separate from any criminal proceedings that might occur. Its purpose is not to punish the wrongdoer but to provide financial stability and compensation to the family members left behind. State laws govern these claims with precision. For instance, a state’s wrongful death statute will explicitly name the parties who have the right to file a lawsuit, which is often limited to a surviving spouse, children, or parents of the deceased. These laws also define the scope of recoverable damages, sometimes referred to as the “full value of the life of the decedent,” which encompasses both the tangible and intangible aspects of a person’s life.

Understanding how an insurance company translates a human life into a monetary figure is essential for families facing this difficult situation. The process is not arbitrary; it is a methodical valuation based on established legal principles, economic projections, and actuarial data. Insurance adjusters follow a structured protocol to analyze every component of the claim, from lost wages to the loss of a guiding hand. The following sections break down this valuation process, revealing the specific factors that influence a final settlement offer and how insurers work to protect their financial interests.

Don’t settle for less, let Life Justice Law Group handle your claim.

The Two Pillars of Valuation: Economic vs. Non-Economic Damages

At the heart of any wrongful death claim valuation lies the distinction between two fundamental types of losses: economic and non-economic damages. Insurance companies and legal teams build their entire financial assessment around these two categories. Economic damages represent the measurable, out-of-pocket financial losses, while non-economic damages attempt to compensate for the profound, intangible human losses that have no precise price tag.

Calculating Economic Damages: The Tangible Losses

Economic damages form the mathematical foundation of a wrongful death claim. They are the losses that can be calculated and proven with documents like pay stubs, tax returns, bills, and expert reports. An insurance adjuster will scrutinize these figures closely.

  • Lost Future Earnings and Earning Capacity: This is often the largest component of economic damages. It is not just the deceased’s salary at the time of death but their projected income over a normal life expectancy. To calculate this, economists and vocational experts are often hired. They analyze factors such as:
    • Age, health, and life expectancy before the incident.
    • Profession, education level, and skills.
    • History of promotions and salary increases.
    • Potential for future career advancement.
    • Lost benefits, including health insurance, retirement contributions (like a 401(k) match), and pensions.
  • Loss of Services: This category accounts for the monetary value of the practical tasks and services the deceased provided to the household. If a stay-at-home parent is lost, the cost of replacing their services like childcare, housekeeping, cooking, and household management can be substantial. Similarly, the loss of a spouse who handled all home repairs or financial planning has a calculable economic value.
  • Medical Expenses: Any medical bills incurred as a result of the fatal injury are included. This covers costs from the moment of the incident until the time of death, such as ambulance fees, emergency room treatment, surgery, and hospital stays.
  • Funeral and Burial Costs: These are the most straightforward economic damages. The full, documented costs of the funeral service, burial or cremation, and related expenses are typically recoverable.

Quantifying Non-Economic Damages: The Intangible Losses

Non-economic damages are much more subjective and, as a result, are often the most contentious part of a claim negotiation. These damages compensate the surviving family members for the emotional and relational losses they have suffered. Because there is no simple formula, insurance adjusters and juries must assign a monetary value to the human impact of the death.

  • Loss of Companionship, Comfort, and Consortium: This applies primarily to a surviving spouse and recognizes the loss of the marital relationship, including affection, emotional support, and intimacy.
  • Loss of Parental Guidance and Nurturing: For surviving minor children, this is a critical component. It represents the loss of a parent’s love, guidance, moral upbringing, and training throughout their formative years.
  • Pain and Suffering of the Survivors: This compensates the family members for their own mental anguish, grief, and emotional distress resulting from the death of their loved one.
  • State-Specific Caps: It is crucial to know that some states have passed laws that place a cap, or limit, on the amount of non-economic damages that can be awarded in certain types of cases, particularly in medical malpractice claims. These caps can dramatically reduce the final value of a claim, regardless of the severity of the family’s loss.

Key Personal Factors That Drive the Claim’s Value

Beyond the broad categories of damages, the specific personal characteristics of the deceased play a massive role in how an insurance company values the claim. Two individuals of different ages and life circumstances who suffer a similar fate will have their claims valued very differently. The adjuster’s goal is to create a detailed portrait of the deceased to justify their valuation.

  • Age and Health: The age of the deceased is a primary factor. The death of a young person with a long, healthy life expectancy ahead of them typically results in a higher valuation for lost future earnings compared to an elderly or retired individual. An adjuster will also investigate the deceased’s health history. A person with a pre-existing chronic illness might have their life expectancy and, therefore, their future earnings potential reduced in the valuation.
  • Income and Earning Potential: A high-earning professional, such as a surgeon or an engineer, will have a claim with a much higher economic value than a minimum-wage worker. The valuation also considers earning potential. For example, a medical student in their final year of residency has a very high earning potential, and this future income will be a central part of the calculation, even if they were earning little at the time of their death.
  • Education and Training: The deceased’s level of education, specialized skills, and professional training are used to project their career trajectory. A person with a graduate degree and a history of consistent employment is seen as having a more stable and predictable earning future, which strengthens the economic portion of the claim.
  • Number of Dependents: The family structure is a significant factor, especially for non-economic damages. The death of a person who was the sole provider for a spouse and three young children will be valued much higher than the death of a single person with no dependents. The loss of guidance for young children is considered a particularly significant non-economic loss.
  • Character and Habits: This is a sensitive but real part of the valuation process. An insurance company’s defense team may investigate the deceased’s personal life. A history of criminal activity, substance abuse, or reckless behavior could be used to argue for a lower value. For example, they might contend that such habits would have reduced the person’s life expectancy or limited their career prospects, thereby lowering the value of the economic damages.

The Critical Role of Liability and Comparative Fault

A wrongful death claim can be valued at millions of dollars, but that valuation is meaningless if the insured party is not legally responsible for the death. Before any damages are paid, the claimant (the surviving family) must prove that the defendant’s negligence or wrongful act directly caused the death. The strength of this proof, and any fault attributed to the deceased, will fundamentally alter the final payout.

Establishing Clear Negligence

The burden of proof rests on the family filing the claim. They must present evidence to show that the defendant owed the deceased a duty of care, breached that duty, and that this breach was the direct cause of the death.

  • Strength of Evidence: The clarity of the evidence is paramount. A case involving a drunk driver who ran a red light and was recorded on camera is a case of clear negligence. In contrast, a complex medical malpractice case might require multiple expert testimonies to establish that a doctor deviated from the standard of care.
  • Documentation: Police reports, accident reconstruction reports, witness statements, medical records, and expert opinions are all used to build a case for liability. The more compelling and clear-cut the evidence of fault, the more pressure the insurance company is under to offer a fair settlement.

Understanding Comparative and Contributory Negligence

In many incidents, more than one party may be partially at fault. State laws have different systems for handling these situations, and they can drastically reduce or even eliminate a settlement.

  • Modified Comparative Negligence: This is the most common system, used by a majority of states. Under this rule, a claimant’s recovery is reduced by their percentage of fault. For example, if the deceased was found to be 20% at fault for a car accident and the total damages were valued at $1 million, the final award would be reduced by 20% to $800,000. Most of these states have a “50% or 51% bar rule,” meaning if the deceased is found to be 50% (or 51%) or more at fault, the family recovers nothing.
  • Pure Comparative Negligence: A smaller number of states follow this rule. Here, a family can recover damages even if the deceased was 99% at fault. Their recovery would simply be reduced by their percentage of fault. For instance, in a $1 million claim where the deceased was 90% at fault, the family could still recover $100,000.
  • Contributory Negligence: This is the harshest rule and is only used in a few states. Under contributory negligence, if the deceased is found to be even 1% at fault for the incident, the family is barred from recovering any damages at all. An insurance company in one of these states will work extremely hard to find any evidence of fault on the part of the deceased.

Insurance Policy Limits: The Ultimate Cap on Recovery

One of the most difficult realities for families to accept is that the value of their wrongful death claim is ultimately constrained by the amount of insurance coverage available. An attorney can calculate a claim to be worth $5 million, but if the at-fault party only has a $250,000 insurance policy, the insurance company is only legally obligated to pay up to that policy limit. Understanding this ceiling is critical to managing expectations.

How Policy Limits Work

Every insurance policy has a maximum amount it will pay out per person and per incident for bodily injury liability. For a standard personal auto policy, these limits might be relatively low, such as $50,000 or $100,000. Even if a jury awards a family $2 million, the insurer’s contractual obligation ends at the policy limit. Any amount beyond that would have to be pursued directly from the at-fault individual’s personal assets, which is often not a viable option if they have limited resources.

Identifying All Available Policies

Because policy limits are so restrictive, a key part of handling a wrongful death claim is to conduct a thorough investigation to uncover all possible sources of insurance coverage. A skilled legal team will not stop at the most obvious policy.

  • Commercial Policies: If the at-fault party was a commercial entity, such as a trucking company, the available insurance is typically much higher. Federal law mandates high liability coverage for commercial trucks, often $1 million or more.
  • Umbrella Policies: Some individuals or businesses purchase umbrella insurance, which provides an extra layer of liability coverage that kicks in after their primary auto or homeowner’s policy is exhausted. These policies can add another $1 million or more in coverage.
  • Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist (UM/UIM) Coverage: This is coverage that the deceased person had on their own auto insurance policy. If the at-fault driver has no insurance (uninsured) or not enough insurance to cover the damages (underinsured), the family may be able to file a claim against their own family member’s UM/UIM policy to help cover the shortfall.
  • Third-Party Liability: In some cases, other parties may share liability. For example, in a drunk driving case, a bar that over-served the driver may be held partially liable under “dram shop” laws. In a case involving a defective product, the manufacturer could also be a defendant with its own commercial liability policy.

Survival Actions vs. Wrongful Death Claims: A Key Distinction

While often discussed together, a wrongful death claim and a survival action are two separate legal claims that arise from the same fatal event. Understanding the difference is important because they compensate for different losses and the money recovered goes to different parties. An insurance company will value each claim separately.

  • Wrongful Death Claim: As discussed, this claim is brought by the surviving family members to compensate them for their losses. The damages are for the loss of financial support, companionship, and guidance. The money recovered goes directly to the family members as defined by state law.
  • Survival Action: This claim is brought by the representative of the deceased’s estate to recover for the losses that the deceased person themselves suffered before they died. In essence, the claim “survives” the person’s death. The money recovered goes into the estate and is distributed to heirs according to the deceased’s will or state intestacy laws.

Damages Recoverable in a Survival Action

The valuation of a survival action focuses on the period between the injury and the moment of death.

  • Conscious Pain and Suffering: This is often the most significant part of a survival action. It is compensation for the physical pain, fear, and emotional distress the deceased experienced before passing away. To recover these damages, the evidence must show that the person was conscious and aware of their suffering, even for a short time. If death was instantaneous, these damages are generally not available.
  • Medical Bills: The full cost of medical care provided to the deceased before their death is recoverable by the estate.
  • Lost Wages: This includes any income the deceased lost from the time of their injury until their death. For example, if a person was hospitalized for two months before passing away, the estate could recover two months of lost wages.

An insurance company will value these two claims in parallel. The total settlement offer in a case will often be a lump sum that resolves both the wrongful death claim and the survival action.

The Adjuster’s Playbook: How Insurers Approach Negotiation

It is essential to remember that an insurance company is a for-profit business. The role of the insurance adjuster assigned to a wrongful death claim is to resolve the claim while minimizing the financial payout for their company. They are not an impartial party; they are a trained negotiator representing the insurer’s interests. Understanding their process and tactics is key.

Initial Assessment and Reserving

Soon after a claim is filed, the adjuster conducts an initial investigation to assess the potential exposure for the company. Based on the initial facts, they will set a “reserve,” which is an amount of money the company sets aside internally to cover the estimated cost of the claim. This figure is based on the severity of the case, the clarity of liability, and the policy limits. The adjuster’s goal is to settle the claim for an amount at or below this reserve.

Using Software and Formulas

Many large insurance companies use sophisticated computer software (like Colossus or a similar program) to generate an initial valuation range for claims. The adjuster inputs data points from the case, such as medical bills, age, and type of injury. The software then uses algorithms to suggest a settlement range. These programs are notorious for undervaluing non-economic damages, as they cannot truly comprehend the human element of loss. The figure they produce is often the starting point for a lowball offer.

Common Tactics Used to Reduce Claim Value

An experienced adjuster has a number of tactics they may use to gain leverage and reduce the final settlement amount.

  • Requesting Extensive and Unrelated Records: The adjuster may ask for the deceased’s entire life medical history, hoping to find a pre-existing condition they can use to argue that the person’s life expectancy was already shortened or that the death was not solely caused by the incident.
  • Disputing Earning Capacity: They may challenge the projections of an economist, arguing that the deceased would not have received promotions, might have changed careers to a lower-paying field, or could have been laid off in the future.
  • Making Quick, Lowball Offers: A common tactic is to approach the grieving family soon after the loss with a quick settlement offer. This is done before the family has had time to fully understand the long-term financial impact of their loss or consult with an attorney. The offer is almost always far below the claim’s true value.
  • Delaying Tactics: On the other hand, some adjusters will intentionally drag out the process. They may be slow to return calls or make endless requests for more documentation. This is designed to put financial pressure on the family, hoping they will become desperate and accept a lower settlement just to get the process over with.

Understand your claim’s true value. Contact Life Justice Law Group today.

Conclusion

The valuation of a wrongful death claim by an insurance company is a methodical and multifaceted process, far removed from the emotional reality of a family’s loss. It begins with a cold calculation of economic damages, such as lost income and medical bills, and is followed by a more subjective assessment of non-economic losses like the absence of companionship and guidance. This initial valuation is then heavily modified by the realities of the case: the degree of fault attributable to each party, the personal and professional profile of the deceased, and, most critically, the hard ceiling imposed by insurance policy limits. The final figure is not a reflection of a life’s worth but a product of legal formulas and business imperatives.

For families confronting this situation, understanding these components is the first step toward protecting their future financial stability. The process is adversarial by nature, with insurance adjusters trained to minimize payouts using a variety of established tactics. They will scrutinize every detail to find reasons to reduce the value of the claim.

Given the financial complexity and the emotional weight of these claims, attempting to handle one without professional guidance is a significant risk. The most crucial action a family can take is to consult with a wrongful death attorney who has experience in this specific area of law. A qualified legal professional can retain the necessary economic and medical experts to build a comprehensive damages model, conduct a deep investigation to uncover all available insurance policies, and effectively counter the tactics used by insurance companies. Securing expert legal representation ensures that your family’s claim is valued properly and that you are positioned to receive the full compensation you are entitled to under the law. Contact us for free evaluation today, and let us fight for the justice your family deserves.